"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/02/2015 at 21:59 • Filed to: None | 6 | 10 |
dr861
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/02/2015 at 22:03 | 3 |
I just can’t imagine Satan driving anything else.
AM
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/02/2015 at 22:08 | 2 |
Big brother would like to have a word with you little C63
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/03/2015 at 00:07 | 1 |
As long as the LT4 exists, no. You're wrong.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
06/03/2015 at 00:37 | 0 |
Okay fine. You only need two 6.2 V8s. Preferably both powering the same car.
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/03/2015 at 01:53 | 1 |
A dual LT4 Escalade sounds nice.
Evan, Pope Of Jalopnik by Self-Appointment
> Your boy, BJR
06/04/2015 at 14:45 | 0 |
No. This is better.
Evan, Pope Of Jalopnik by Self-Appointment
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/04/2015 at 14:54 | 1 |
You think that’s good, watch these - this wagon is purely, utterly evil. I want it:
Your boy, BJR
> Evan, Pope Of Jalopnik by Self-Appointment
06/04/2015 at 19:11 | 0 |
No. It isn’t.
.....punk ass...
Evan, Pope Of Jalopnik by Self-Appointment
> Your boy, BJR
06/05/2015 at 15:51 | 0 |
Easy guy. It was tongue-in-cheek...
Your boy, BJR
> Evan, Pope Of Jalopnik by Self-Appointment
06/05/2015 at 18:10 | 0 |